USPTO serial 85460887
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Cummings Engineering Consulting, Incorporated
Chandler, AZ
Other trademarks owned by Cummings Engineering Consulting, Incorporated
Cummings Engineering Consulting, Incorporated
Chandler, AZ
Other trademarks owned by Cummings Engineering Consulting, Incorporated
Cummings Engineering Consulting, Incorporated
Chandler, AZ
Other trademarks owned by Cummings Engineering Consulting, Incorporated
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Javier M. Leija
JAVIER M. LEIJA JAVIER M. LEIJA ATTORNEY AT LAW, PLLC2323 E ZION WAYCHANDLER, AZ 85249-2924UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Application service provider featuring application programming interface (API) software for operating and managing cryptographically enabled communications devices; Cloud computing featuring software for use in operating and managing cryptographically enabled communications devices; Computer network design and computer software design for the field of cryptographically enabled communications devices; Computer services, namely, acting as an application service provider in the field of information management to host computer application software for the purpose of operating and managing cryptographically enabled communications devices; Computer software development in the field of cryptographically enabled communications devices; Computer software development, computer programming and maintenance of computer software for cryptographically enabled communications devices; Consulting services in the field of the design of cryptographically enabled communications devices; Custom design and development of cryptographically enabled communications devices; Design and development of computer software for operating and managing cryptographically enabled communications devices; Design and development of software and hardware for operating and managing cryptographically enabled communications devices; Design and development of cryptographically enabled communications devices; Design for others in the field of computer networks, software, and engineering for the field of cryptographically enabled communications devices; Design of computer networks and software for others for the field of cryptographically enabled communications devices; Design, development, and consulting services related thereto in the field of cryptographically enabled communications devices; Design, development, and implementation of software for operating and managing cryptographically enabled communications devices; Designing cryptographically enabled communications devices; Installation, maintenance and repair of cryptographically enabled communications device software; Maintenance of computer software used for operating and managing cryptographically enabled communications devices; Software development and product development consulting in the field of cryptographically enabled communications devices; Software development and product development in the field of cryptographically enabled communications devices; Software development consulting in the field of cryptographically enabled communications devices; Software development in the field of cryptographically enabled communications devices; Technology specification, namely, analyzing technology requirements and developing recommendations for the computer software and systems and other technology needed to meet those requirements, in the field of cryptographically enabled communications | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 2011 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 16, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 31, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 11, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 26, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 7, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 30, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 23, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |