Drawing for GAME GENIE

USPTO serial 85472382

GAME GENIE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KAUFMAN, LAURIE R
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GAME GENIE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edward C. Schewe

EDWARD C SCHEWE SCHEWE & ASSOCIATES1600 ROSECRANS AVENUE4TH FLOORMANHATTAN BEACH, CA 90266-3708

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Cheat device, namely, software downloaded from an online database to allow a user to manipulate selectable game play features associated with game software for video games to be played on personal computers and video game consolesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 3, 2014MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 30, 2013ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 30, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 16, 2013EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Aug 8, 2013RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Jul 18, 2013GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 18, 2013GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 18, 2013CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
May 20, 2013JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 18, 2013EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 18, 2013EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 16, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 16, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 16, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 2, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 2, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 20, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 17, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 18, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 18, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 18, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 1, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 29, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 19, 2011MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Nov 18, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 17, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance