Drawing for IN-ROUTE

USPTO serial 85474357

IN-ROUTE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
OLANDRIA, WARREN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IN-ROUTE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher S. Clancy

CHRISTOPHER S. CLANCY PANDUIT CORP.6200 175TH STTINLEY PARK, IL 60477-3037UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Telecommunication products, namely, security device for protecting and securing electric and fiber optic cable connectors within their connection points such as patch panels or wall jacks, metal grounding bushings brackets clamps and mounts, electrical or fiber optic cable ducts, cable clamping rails, cable entries, fiber optic cables, electric cables, cables for electrical or optical signal transmission, printers, label printers, environmental enclosures specially adapted to hold and protect electrical and fiber optic wire/cable termination/connection points and house connecting equipment, electrical and fiber optic patch cables, and cable mounts for use in zone architectureACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 21, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 21, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 20, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
May 19, 2015EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
May 14, 2015EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
May 12, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Apr 30, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 15, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Nov 14, 2014EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Nov 7, 2014EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Nov 7, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 13, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
May 12, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
May 6, 2014EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
May 6, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 17, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Dec 16, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Dec 9, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Dec 9, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Nov 6, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Nov 6, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 14, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 19, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Mar 19, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 27, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Feb 13, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 11, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 31, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 30, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 30, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 30, 2013ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Aug 1, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Aug 1, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 1, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 29, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 28, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 28, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 11, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 11, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 11, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 22, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Nov 19, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance