USPTO serial 85474960
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Safe Flight Instrument Corporation
White Plains, NY
Other trademarks owned by Safe Flight Instrument Corporation
Safe Flight Instrument Corporation
White Plains, NY
Other trademarks owned by Safe Flight Instrument Corporation
Safe Flight Instrument Corporation
White Plains, NY
Other trademarks owned by Safe Flight Instrument Corporation
White Plains, NY
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan E. Clady
Susan E. Clady Benesch Friedlander Coplan & Aronoff LLP200 Public SquareSuite 2300Cleveland, OH 44114| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computers for managing aircraft engine thrust; Computers with dual monitors for managing aircraft control devices; Avionic instruments for measuring angle of attack of an aircraft in flight; Computers for warning of impending aircraft loss of lift and preventing loss of lift; Heater current monitor; Converters for translating aircraft angle of attack into different electrical formats; Avionic sensor systems, namely, processors for optimizing aircraft takeoff, climb and descent; Instruments for aligning aircraft angle-of-attack transducers, transmitters and sensors; Instruments used in aircraft automatic throttle systems including a processor for to prevent forces from the engine linkage from moving the throttles in the cockpit; Computers that warn of airflow downburst requiring corrective action; Automatic throttle control systems for aircraft; Electronic controllers for engaging and disengaging automatic throttle systems for aircraft; Autopower computer; Avionic sensor systems, namely, processors for automatically maintaining a particular airspeed or engine setting; Control and display screens used for automatic throttle system for aircraft; Avionic sensor systems, namely, processors for automatically maintaining a particular airspeed or engine setting; Avionic sensor systems, namely, processors for minimizing modification of throttle control assemblies in aircraft; Avionic sensor systems, namely, aircraft approach speed indicators; Avionic sensor systems, namely, aircraft speed control indicators; Avionic sensor systems, namely, instruments for indicating angle of attack of an aircraft in flight; Avionic sensor systems, namely, instruments for sensing angle of attack of an aircraft in flight; Avionic sensor systems, namely, processors for indicating angle of attack of an aircraft in flight; Ice detector; Optical ice detector; Sensors for detecting aircraft flap deflection angle; Computers for controlling aircraft performance; Avionic sensor systems, namely, processors for monitoring helicopter engine and rotor system and warning of maximum ratings for the engine, transmission or rotor system; Avionic sensor systems, namely, processors for monitoring and warning of aircraft operation near live transmission lines; Avionic sensor systems, namely, processors for converting antenna impedance; Avionic sensor systems, namely, processors for monitoring aircraft landing lights; Avionic sensor systems, namely, processors for optimizing aircraft performance in takeoffs, climbs, approaches and upset recovery; Avionic sensor systems, namely, processors for preventing aircraft stall; Avionic sensor systems, namely, processors for providing warning of impending aircraft stall; Horn used in aircraft for providing warning of impending aircraft stall; Horn assemblies for installation in aircraft cockpit | ACTIVE | Oct 31, 1950 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2023 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2023 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| May 16, 2023 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| May 15, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 28, 2022 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2018 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2018 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 25, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 13, 2018 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2017 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - POWER OF ATTORNEY ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2017 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Oct 30, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 14, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 25, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 24, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 8, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |