Drawing for GREENSMART

USPTO serial 85476490

GREENSMART

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GREENSMART?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Janet A. Marvel

Janet A. Marvel PATTISHALL, MCAULIFFE, NEWBURY, HILLIARD & GERALDS200 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2900CHICAGO, IL 60606-6631UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Paper for use on examination tablesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 22, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 22, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 11, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Apr 10, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Apr 9, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Mar 4, 2014NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED
Mar 3, 2014TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION
Mar 3, 2014PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Mar 3, 2014PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Feb 20, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Aug 20, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 17, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 10, 2013TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS
Jul 10, 2013OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Jul 10, 2013OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999
Jul 10, 2013MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 14, 2012CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED
Nov 14, 2012APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF
Nov 7, 2012OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Nov 1, 2012EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED
Aug 2, 2012ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Jul 10, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jul 10, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 20, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Jun 1, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 31, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 11, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 10, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 10, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 10, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 7, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 29, 2011MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED
Nov 28, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Nov 22, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance