Drawing for TUI COLLECTION

USPTO serial 85477292

TUI COLLECTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KERTGATE, AMY L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TUI COLLECTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven War

STEVEN WAR MCNEELY, HARE & WAR LLP5335 WISCONSIN AVE NW STE 440WASHINGTON, DC 20015-2079UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Interior design services for residential and commercial spaces; interior design services including space planning, furniture selection, material and surface selection; design of custom furniture and decorative home accessories for others; furniture design and furniture accessory design services; and interior design services for the purpose of reflecting a lifestyleACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 4, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 4, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 7, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Oct 6, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Oct 1, 2014EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Oct 1, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 26, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Apr 25, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Apr 22, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Apr 1, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Apr 1, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 1, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 19, 2013ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED
Jul 3, 2013ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Jun 4, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jun 4, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 15, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
May 2, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 30, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 30, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 30, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 23, 2013ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Oct 24, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Oct 24, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 24, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 3, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 3, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 21, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 13, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 13, 2012GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED
Mar 13, 2012GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED
Mar 13, 2012EPENCOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY
Mar 13, 2012CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED
Mar 7, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 29, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Nov 23, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance