Drawing for PROSPERING

USPTO serial 85481748

PROSPERING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
ESTRADA, LINDA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PROSPERING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard L. Hill

Richard L. Hill Durham Jones & Pinegar, P.C.3301 North Thanksgiving Way, Suite 400Lehi, UT 84043UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Publications, namely, books, booklets, manuals, workbooks, instructor manuals, newsletters, periodicals, paper and transparency documents for display by overhead projector, charts, tables and handouts, all in the fields of business and investing, including ecommerce, realestate investing, stock market investing, personal finances, and small businessACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 26, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 25, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 21, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 16, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Aug 26, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Aug 26, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 6, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Jul 19, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 16, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 25, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 25, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 25, 2014ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
May 1, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Dec 18, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Oct 31, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Oct 30, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jun 26, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Apr 23, 2013CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Apr 23, 2013CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Apr 1, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 1, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 27, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 25, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 1, 2012ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Oct 1, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 24, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 14, 2012MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 12, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 2, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 2, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Dec 1, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance