USPTO serial 85498805
GEARHEAD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARLSEN, EMILY K
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GEARHEAD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Idaho Falls, ID
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven Rinehart
STEVEN RINEHART WESTERN IP50 W BROADWAY STE 1200SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101-2029UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | All terrain vehicles (ATVs); ATVs (all terrain vehicles); Fitted motorcycle covers; Fitted plastic liner and support panels for motorcycle saddlebags; Hubs for vehicle wheels (motorcycles); Metal stands for holding stationary motorcycles in an upright position; Motorcycle accessories, namely, front and side plates; Motorcycle accessories, namely, gas tank and radiator shrouds; Motorcycle and automobile structural parts, namely, sumpguards; Motorcycle bags, namely, tank bags, saddle bags, sissy bar bags and tail bags; Motorcycle drive chains ; Motorcycle engines; Motorcycle grip tape; Motorcycle kickstands; Motorcycle parts, namely, brackets for mounting motorcycle saddlebags to motorcycles; Motorcycle parts, namely, chromed safety pads; Motorcycle saddlebags; Motorcycle sprockets; Motorcycles; Motorcycles for motocross; Motorized scooters and structural parts therefor; Parts of motorcycles, namely, brake cables; Parts of motorcycles, namely, brake calipers; Parts of motorcycles, namely, brake levers; Parts of motorcycles, namely, brake master cylinder assemblies; Parts of motorcycles, namely, brake rotors; Parts of motorcycles, namely, clutch cables; Parts of motorcycles, namely, clutch master cylinder assemblies; Parts of motorcycles, namely, fork bearings and races; Parts of motorcycles, namely, fork dust boots; Parts of motorcycles, namely, fork seals; Parts of motorcycles, namely, front dash panels; Parts of motorcycles, namely, front spacers; Parts of motorcycles, namely, handle bar control levers; Parts of motorcycles, namely, handle bar throttles; Parts of motorcycles, namely, handle bars; Parts of motorcycles, namely, headlight mounts; Parts of motorcycles, namely, master cylinders; Parts of motorcycles, namely, shift levers; Shock absorbers for motorcycles | ACTIVE | Aug 24, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 27, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 27, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 30, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 30, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 12, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 27, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 27, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |