USPTO serial 85503858
ENERGY CUBE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PRICE, WANDA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ENERGY CUBE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DR MATTHIAS SCHOLL ESQ
DR MATTHIAS SCHOLL ESQ DR MATTHIAS SCHOLL ESQ14781 MEMORIAL DR # 1319HOUSTON, TX 77079-5210UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Aerators; Air suction machines; Centrifugal pumps; Compressed air pumps; Fluid power component kit for machine control comprising pumps and valves; Starters for motors and engines; Vacuum pumps | ACTIVE | Aug 20, 2010 |
| 009 | Accumulator boxes; Batteries for lighting; Batteries for pocketlamps; Batteries for vehicles; Battery chargers; Chargers for electric batteries; Commutators; Electric accumulators for vehicles; Electric converters; Electric wires and cables; Galvanic batteries; Inverters; Power inverters; Solar batteries; Voltage stabilizing power supply | ACTIVE | Aug 20, 2010 |
| 011 | Electric lamps; Electric lanterns; Electric torches for lighting; Flashlights; Headlights for vehicles; Ice boxes; Lighting apparatus for vehicles; Lights for vehicles; Pocket search lights; Projector lamps; Vehicle headlights; Energy saving lamps | ACTIVE | Aug 20, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NEW FOCUS LIGHTING & POWER TECHNOLOGY (SHANGHAI) CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named ENERGY CUBE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 31, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 30, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 2012 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |