Drawing for H-1

USPTO serial 85508241

H-1

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FRENCH, CURTIS W
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with H-1?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michelle C. Burke

MICHELLE C. BURKE MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP227 W MONROE ST STE 4400CHICAGO, IL 60606-5058UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware; computer software, namely, encryption, security, data protection, and biometric authentication software, all provided on a prerecorded CD-ROMs for use in connection with secure personal computer login systems, door access control systems, automated teller machines, and other applications where secure access would be neededACTIVE
042Design and development services for secure access control systems, namely, the systems featuring controllers, scanners, and doors; maintenance of computer software used for secure access control systems; consulting services relating to the design and development of secure access control systems; leasing of computer software systems and programs used for secure access control systems; remote computer network technical monitoring services; monitoring the computer systems of others for technical purposes and providing back-up computer programs and facilitiesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 26, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 25, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 3, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Oct 1, 2014EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Oct 1, 2014EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Oct 1, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 4, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Apr 2, 2014EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Apr 2, 2014EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Apr 2, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 4, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Oct 2, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Oct 2, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Oct 2, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 4, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Apr 2, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Apr 2, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Apr 2, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 23, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 28, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Aug 28, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 8, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Jul 23, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 23, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 2, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 8, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jun 8, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jun 8, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jun 8, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Apr 11, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 11, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 11, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 9, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 10, 2012MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Jan 9, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jan 7, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance