Drawing for BUILT TO LAST

USPTO serial 85526282

BUILT TO LAST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
RICHARDS, LESLIE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BUILT TO LAST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter M. de Jonge

PETER M DE JONGE THORPE NORTH AND WESTERN LLP8180 S 700 ESUITE 350SANDY, UT 84070-0561

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Non-metal interlocking floor tiles; non-metal interlocking floor tiles for recreational and athletic play surfaces; non-metal interlocking floor tiles for commercial and industrial uses; recreational and athletic play surfaces, namely, athletic flooringACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 29, 2014MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Sep 23, 2014ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Sep 23, 2014EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Aug 5, 2014EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
May 22, 2014GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
May 22, 2014GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
May 22, 2014CNCFSU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN
May 10, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 10, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 28, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 11, 2014ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Apr 11, 2014EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Apr 11, 2014JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Apr 11, 2014EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Oct 11, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Oct 11, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 11, 2013CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 27, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 26, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 26, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 25, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 2013CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2013SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Jan 31, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Jan 10, 2013IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Jan 10, 2013EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jan 10, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Aug 14, 2012NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 19, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 30, 2012NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 4, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 4, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 31, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jan 30, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance