USPTO serial 85526805
EPICURIOUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EPICURIOUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eric E. Gisolfi
ERIC E. GISOLFI Sabin, Bermant & Gould LLPOne World Trade CenterNEW YORK, NY 10007-2915UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electric coffee grinders, electric spice grinders, electric mixers, electric blenders, electric food processors, electric juicers, electric can openers, electric wine aerators | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | Carving forks, zesters, knife sharpeners, meat tenderizers, namely, kitchen mallets, non-electric can openers, non-electric fruit and vegetable peelers, nut crackers, corers, hand-operated slicers, mandolins for cutting foods; mortars and pestles | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Kitchen scales, meat thermometers; protective covers and cases for cell phones, laptops and portable media players | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Fondue sets, namely, fondue pots, burners, forks, bowls and candles sold as a unit; electric coffee makers, electric toasters, bread-making machines, electric slow cookers, electric rice cookers, electric pressure cookers, electric griddles and grills, electric waffle makers, electric soda makers, ice cream makers, wine refrigerators, electric deep fryers | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Household utensils, namely, utility bowls, mixing spoons, non-electric egg beaters, non-electric hand juicers, spatulas, serving ladles, graters for household purposes, tongs, cooking skewers and steamers, colanders, cooking strainers, tagines, ramekins, tea kettles, pizza stones, cooking grills, griddles, woks, ice cream scoops, clothes drying racks, garlic presses, salad spinners, spoon rests, food basters, melon ballers, potato mashers; cookie cutters and molds, pie and cake plates, paper cupcake baking cups, rolling pins, dough cutters, cooling racks for baked goods, household containers for carrying cakes and cupcakes, high temperature nylon and polyethylene pan liners that help prevent food from sticking to the pan while storing, warming and cooking foods, flour sifters, cupcake trees, pastry decorating sets sold as a unit comprised primarily of pastry decorating bags and tips, non-electric pastry dough blenders, biscuit cutters, battery-operated cookie presses; serving utensils, namely, servingware for serving food, serving platters, plates, mugs, cups, bowls, drinking glasses, salt and pepper shakers, sugar bowls, butter dishes, gravy boats, pitchers, ice buckets, decanters, tea pots, plastic storage containers for household purposes, chopsticks, plastic water bottles sold empty, travel mugs; napkin rings, recipe boxes, dish drying racks, trivets, spice racks, paper towel holders; corkscrews, wine glasses, cocktail shakers, tumblers, ice cube trays, manually-operated wine aerators; non-electric food mills for herbs and spices, tortilla presses | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Aprons | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Advance Magazine Publishers Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Advance Magazine Publishers Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named EPICURIOUS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 13, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 29, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2015 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2015 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 12, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2015 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 5, 2015 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 5, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 11, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2014 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 29, 2014 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 4, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2014 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 11, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 28, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 12, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 20, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 24, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 9, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 7, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 6, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 2, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |