USPTO serial 85531874
VOV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEAM, ALEX S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VOV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KELLY Y. HWANG
KELLY Y HWANG LERNER DAVID LITTENBERG KRUMHOLZ & ME600 SOUTH AVE WSTE 2WESTFIELD, NJ 07090-1497Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Perfumes, Eyebrow pencils, Mascaras, Lipsticks, Eye shadows, Nail polish, Eyeliners, Hair sprays, Solid powders for compacts, Cosmetic beauty masks, Cosmetic nourishing creams, Nail enamel removers, Mask pack for cosmetic purposes, Massage gels, Enamels for manicure, Varnish-removing preparations, Cheek colors, Blushers, Sunscreen lotions; Sunscreen creams, Nail colorants, Nail decolorants, Eye make-up removers, Lip brighteners, Cosmetic pencils, False eyelashes, Adhesives for affixing false Eyelashes sold exclusively through applicant's on-line and retail stores | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2013 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 18, 2013 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 18, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 22, 2013 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Mar 6, 2013 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2013 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2013 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 20, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2013 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 20, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 20, 2013 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 21, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 21, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 7, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 14, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2012 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |