USPTO serial 85539481
NIAGARAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEAM, ALEX S
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NIAGARAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
St Catherines, Ontario, CA
St Catherines, Ontario, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Motor vehicles, namely, cars, classic performance and collectible automobiles, motorcycles, tractors, trains, airplanes and hot rods | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Display cases; display racks | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Beer | ACTIVE | — |
| 033 | Wine; wine-based drinks | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Providing business meeting rooms; beverage concession stands; retail clothing store services; gift shop services; vintage car club services, namely, promoting the interests of vintage automobile owners and enthusiasts, and buying club services in the field of vintage automobiles and organizing business networking events for owners and enthusiasts of vintage automobiles | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Restoration of automobiles; mechanic services; automobile body repair services | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Storage of motor vehicles, namely, classic performance and collectible automobiles, cars, motorcycles, tractors, trains, airplanes and hot rods; leasing of storage space, namely, leasing of fixed and movable storage containers to commercial and residential users; tour conducting and tour guide services; vintage club services, namely, arranging and organizing trips for vintage automobile owners and enthusiasts | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Display in the nature of entertainment exhibitions featuring motor vehicles, namely, classic performance and collectible automobiles, cars, motorcycles, tractors, trains, airplanes and hot rods; hosting and rental of facilities for entertainment events, namely, concerts, picnics; vintage club services, namely, organizing and arranging automobile riding excursions and automobile races for entertainment purposes for vintage automobile owners and enthusiasts; dance club services; sports club services; health club services, namely, providing instruction and equipment in the field of physical exercise; ticket agency services for concert tickets; special event planning for social entertainment purposes; museum services | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Restaurant services; take-out restaurant services; cafeteria services; bar services; snack bar services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by W.S. Tyler Canada, Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by W.S. Tyler Canada, Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named NIAGARAGE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 19, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 17, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 20, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 31, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 10, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 10, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 4, 2014 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 25, 2014 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Nov 13, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 12, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 12, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 31, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 14, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 5, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 1, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 1, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 1, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 27, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 8, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 22, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |