USPTO serial 85539617
TWG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 29, 2017
- Examiner
- REINHART, MEGHAN M
- Law office
- —
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with TWG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Tsit Wing International Company Limited
Road Town, Tortola, VG
Other trademarks owned by Tsit Wing International Company Limited
Tsit Wing International Company Limited
Road Town, Tortola, VG
Other trademarks owned by Tsit Wing International Company Limited
Tsit Wing International Company Limited
Tortola, VG
Other trademarks owned by Tsit Wing International Company Limited
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Tea; black tea; partly fermented tea; herbal and non-herbal tea; coffee; coffee, roasted or non-roasted, not decaffeinated, either ground or in bean form; coffee beans; instant coffee; non-alcoholic coffee-based beverages; individual package of mixed content of coffee with sugar and milk powder; canned coffee; loose tea leaf; tea bag; instant tea; non-alcoholic tea-based beverages; individual package of mixed content of tea with sugar and milk powder; canned milk tea; individual package of mixed content of coffee and tea with sugar and milk powder; organic coffee and tea; non-alcoholic chocolate-based beverages; coffee substitutes; coffee essence; coffee extracts; coffee flavored syrup used in making food and beverages; flavorings of tea; tea extracts; fruit tea; cakes; chocolate; cocoa; sugar; rice; tapioca; sago; artificial coffee; flour and preparations made from cereals, namely, cereal bars, whole grain based breakfast cereal; cereal based snack food; breakfast cereals; bread; pastry; confectionery, namely, chocolate, sweets, lollipops, candy bars, cotton candy, toffee, chewing gums and confectionery made of sugar; ices; honey; treacle; yeast; baking-powder; salt; mustard; vinegar; sauces; spices; condiments, namely, ketchup, mayonnaise, pepper; ice cream; noodles; pasta; pizzas; sandwiches; spaghetti; frozen yogurt; granola; instant noodles; vermicelli noodles; udon noodles; beverages made from chocolate, namely, chocolate based beverages; chocolate coffee; chocolate sauce; chocolate syrup; chocolate food flavourings; chocolate extracts; biscuits; milk chocolate; almond confectionery; almond powder for use as a flavouring and seasoning; almond paste; flavouring syrup for food; oatmeal; ketchup; tomato sauce; barbeque sauce; chili sauce; meat gravies; meat sauce | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | [ Beers; mineral and aerated waters; non-alcoholic drinks, namely, carbonated drinks; fruit drinks and fruit juices; syrups for making beverages; preparations for making beverages, namely, fruit drinks; almond milk for use as a beverage; soda water; spring water; fruit flavored drinking water; bottled water ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 043 | [ Restaurant and cafe services; catering services; bars; cocktail lounge services; fast food restaurant services; canteen services; self-service restaurants; café and cafeteria services; coffee shop services; takeaway fast food restaurant services; bakery services, namely, manufacture of bakery products to order and/or specification of others; preparation of cooked, semi-cooked or preserved meat, fish, poultry and vegetables; services for providing food and drink ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Tsit Wing International Company Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Tsit Wing International Company Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Tsit Wing International Company Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named TWG
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2023 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2023 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 19, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 26, 2023 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 21, 2017 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 14, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 27, 2017 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jun 27, 2017 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 16, 2016 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 30, 2016 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 13, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 21, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 21, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 17, 2016 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 17, 2016 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 17, 2016 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 13, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 17, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 28, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 25, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 25, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 6, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 4, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 3, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 24, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 18, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 24, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 24, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 21, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 29, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 29, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 2012 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Feb 27, 2012 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |