USPTO serial 85542415
APPCARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 21, 2017
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with APPCARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $1,097*
Plus Government fees of $1,950
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New York, NY, US
New York, NY, US
WILMINGTON, DE, US
Wilmington, DE, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sara M. Bauer
Sara M. Bauer Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP470 Atlantic Avenue, Suite 600Independence WharfBoston, MA 02110Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Card readers for credit cards; computer application software for mobile telephones, namely, software for participating in a loyalty rewards program and for accessing digital receipts, coupons and purchasing discounts; computer application software for mobile telephones, namely, software for processing coupons and purchasing discounts, and for managing loyalty rewards programs; computer operating programs; chips, namely, integrated circuits; computer peripheral devices, namely, dongles and sniffers; downloadable computer programs for participating in a loyalty rewards program and for accessing digital receipts, coupons and purchasing discounts; downloadable computer programs for processing coupons and purchasing discounts, and for managing loyalty rewards programs; data processing apparatus, namely, dongles and sniffers; computer network diagnostic apparatus, namely, dongles and sniffers, not for medical purposes; downloadable image files containing artwork, text, photographs and video content; encoded magnetic cards, namely, loyalty rewards cards; intercommunication apparatus, namely, dongles and sniffers; interfaces for computers | ACTIVE | Mar 9, 2012 |
| 035 | marketing advice; marketing analysis; marketing assistance; marketing consultancy; marketing services; product marketing; promotional marketing; market analysis; business, advertising and marketing consultancy; direct marketing services; online advertising and marketing services; market research services regarding usage habits and customer loyalty; development and implementation of marketing strategies for others | ACTIVE | Mar 9, 2012 |
| 042 | non-downloadable computer software for participating in a loyalty rewards program and for accessing digital receipts, coupons and purchasing discounts; non-downloadable computer software for processing coupons and purchasing discounts, and for managing loyalty rewards programs | ACTIVE | Mar 9, 2012 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by APPCARD, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by APPCARD, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by APPCARD, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by App Card Solutions, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named APPCARD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 11, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2023 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2023 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2023 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2023 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 15, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 15, 2022 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 19, 2017 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2017 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 16, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 21, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2016 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2016 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 19, 2016 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2016 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 20, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 3, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2015 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 31, 2015 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 10, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2015 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2015 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 6, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2014 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 3, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 2, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 28, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 3, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 3, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 9, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 19, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 29, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 29, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 21, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2013 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 13, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 13, 2013 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 13, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 25, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 5, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 15, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 1, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 1, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |