USPTO serial 85542551
PROCEDURE WIZARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 23, 2013
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 100 - MANAGING ATTORNEY
What this means
Status 701 means the registration is active and the first Section 8 declaration of continued use was accepted. The next major deadline is the combined Section 8 and Section 9 filing at the 10-year anniversary. Calendar the 10-year Section 8 and 9 combined renewal.
Need help with PROCEDURE WIZARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for suggesting medical treatment options | ACTIVE | Oct 6, 2012 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 21, 2024 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Mar 15, 2024 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 23, 2024 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2024 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2024 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2022 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 4, 2022 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 25, 2018 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2018 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Oct 24, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 22, 2018 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2018 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2013 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 18, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 18, 2013 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 17, 2013 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 17, 2013 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 14, 2013 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 14, 2013 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2013 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2013 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 13, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 13, 2013 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 13, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 13, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 6, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 26, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 24, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |