USPTO serial 85544208
CHEDDAR OBSESSION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DINALLO, KEVIN M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHEDDAR OBSESSION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Markham, Ontario, CA
Markham, Ontario, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat products, namely, pork, chicken, beef, turkey, ox, seafood, bacon, back bacon, peameal bacon, bacon bits and ends, pork bellies, fresh or frozen pork, fresh or frozen beef, marinated meat, sliced and loaf luncheon meats, deli meats, pickled meats, bologna, ham, smoked ham, cooked ham, black forest ham, kielbasa, sausages, smoked sausage, polish sausage, fresh sausages; beer sausage, salami, summer sausage, smoked beef, smoked meat, ox tongue, meatloaf, corned beef, pastrami, roast beef, pepperoni, seasoned meat, fresh meat, frozen meat, processed meat, sausage sticks and rings, hamburgers, turkey burger patties, beef steaks, beef roasts, liver sausage, beef jerky, chili con carne, frankfurters, wieners, hot dogs, bratwurst sausage, Italian sausage, Octoberfest sausage, meat pastas in the nature of prepared entrée consisting primarily of meat with pasta, headcheese, spiced meats, spareribs, buffalo chicken wings, chicken wings, meat pies, prepared entrees consisting primarily of seafood with alfredo sauce; salads, namely, garden salads, fruit salads, vegetable salads; cabbage rolls; cottage rolls, namely, ham shoulder; entrees, namely, prepared entrees consisting primarily of seafood; meat products, namely, semi-dried, dried and dry cured beef, turkey, chicken, pork, sausage, pepperoni, bacon and shaved meats; frozen or refrigerated, cooked, partially cooked or uncooked turkey or chicken meat; fresh tray packs of turkey or chicken breasts, legs or thighs; chicken wings; frozen whole turkeys and chickens, fresh whole turkeys and chickens; frozen or refrigerated, cooked, partially cooked or uncooked breaded and battered pork, beef, turkey or chicken in the form of nuggets, fingers, burgers, balls, schnitzel, breast and fritters; ground chicken, and ground turkey | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 1, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 12, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2016 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 10, 2015 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 18, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2015 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 11, 2015 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 29, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 4, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 1, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 6, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 16, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 28, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 20, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 13, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 13, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 17, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 17, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 6, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 5, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 30, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 31, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |