USPTO serial 85545469
BIZDEFEND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4527695Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 13, 2014
- Examiner
- RICHARDSON, JENNIFER D
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BIZDEFEND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | on-line retail store services featuring software applications for use in responding to data breaches and identity theft | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 036 | calculating credit scores for businesses | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | computer consultation services in the field of computer network security for victims of data breaches and identity theft | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 045 | fraud detection services, namely, monitoring business payment cards for inappropriate use; identity theft prevention services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by D+H Limited Partnership
- Other trademarks owned by D+H Limited Partnership
- Other trademarks owned by D+H Limited Partnership
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named BIZDEFEND
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2020 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 13, 2019 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 4, 2014 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 2, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 18, 2014 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Feb 18, 2014 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 16, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 26, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 12, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 11, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 6, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 3, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2012 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 6, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 8, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 25, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |