USPTO serial 85546226
ABUNDANT YOGI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5510622Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 10, 2018
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ABUNDANT YOGI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
London, Ontario, CA
London, Ontario, CA
London, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Todd A. Denys
TODD A. DENYS PORZIO, BROMBERG & NEWMAN, P.C.600 Alexander Road, Suite 2-1PRINCETON, NJ 08540UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Prerecorded CDs and DVDs featuring information regarding yoga and yoga instructions | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, leotards and tutus, dance costumes, dance leggings, dance shoes, dance slippers, yoga shirts, yoga tops, yoga t-shirts, yoga pants, sweat shirts, sweat pants, leg warmers, socks, scarves, wraps and headbands | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Yoga instruction services, yoga teacher training services, pilates, dance and meditation instruction | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Shackelton Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Shackelton Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Shackelton Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named ABUNDANT YOGI
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2025 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 10, 2023 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 24, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 4, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2018 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 16, 2018 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Mar 14, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 14, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 31, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 27, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 15, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 8, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 1, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 19, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 10, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 7, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 20, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 20, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 7, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 7, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 19, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 4, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 4, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 3, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 30, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 30, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |