USPTO serial 85549175
REDLINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REINHART, MEGHAN M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with REDLINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GARRETT M. WEBER
GARRETT M WEBER LINDQUIST & VENNUM PLLP4200 IDS CENTER80 SOUTH EIGHTH STREET , STE 4200MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-2274Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004 | CUTTING OILS FOR INDUSTRIAL USE | ACTIVE | Aug 31, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2014 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 24, 2014 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 24, 2014 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 5, 2014 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 4, 2013 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2013 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2013 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 10, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 8, 2013 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2013 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 8, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 8, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 11, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 11, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 29, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |