USPTO serial 85556920
MAMMOTH ATTITUDE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YARD, JOHN S
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAMMOTH ATTITUDE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Oroville, CA
Oroville, CA
Oroville, CA
Oroville, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Apparel, namely, t-shirts, longsleeve t-shirts, tank tops, hooded sweatshirts, jerseys, pajama pants, pajama tops, long underwear, underwear, sweatpants, socks, hats, beanies, scarves; belts; shoes; snowsport outerwear, namely, ski pants, ski bibs, ski parkas | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Steinmann, Julie Lynn
- Other trademarks owned by Steinmann, Julie Lynn
- Other trademarks owned by Rockwell, Christopher Michael
- Other trademarks owned by Rockwell, Christopher Michael
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named MAMMOTH ATTITUDE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 12, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 10, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 28, 2014 | NEWN | NEW NOA TO ISSUE | — |
| Apr 18, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 3, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 24, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 20, 2014 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Aug 20, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 5, 2013 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 30, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 10, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 10, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 2, 2013 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 21, 2012 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Dec 11, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 9, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 7, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 6, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 20, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |