USPTO serial 85558920
LEDLABS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRADLEY, EVELYN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LEDLABS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Cheung Sha Wan Kowloon, HK
Cheung Sha Wan Kowloon, HK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James A. Henricks
JAMES A. HENRICKS HENRICKS, SLAVIN & HOLMES LLP840 APOLLO ST STE 200EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245-4737UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic regulating and control devices for the operation of light emitting diodes; light emitting diode (LED) displays and arrays; LED arrays, clusters and displays for use in instrumentation and illumination devices, in visible light and infra-red spectrum; electronic advertisement and messaging display units; multimedia lighted display boards for video, advertising, information and image display; control devices for controlling light, color and brightness distribution in a light display; lighting drivers and controllers; driving apparatus and control apparatus, namely, electrical and power drivers and electrical and power controllers for lighting systems and for operating and controlling lighting systems; driving apparatus and control apparatus, namely, electrical and power drivers and electrical and power controllers for lighting systems and for operating and controlling video, displays, architectural accent, commercial, industrial, residential lighting applications; LEDs (light-emitting diodes) and LED displays for use in electronic displays and architectural accent, commercial, industrial and residential lighting applications; electronic ballasts for lighting purposes; light engines, namely, electronic power supplies and drivers, and electronic power supplies and drivers combined with LED arrays; control systems, namely, hardware and software used to control lighting systems and operate lighting systems and control LED lighting systems and operate LED lighting systems; control systems, namely, hardware and software used to control electrical and power drivers and electrical and power controllers for lighting systems and LED lighting systems, and for operating and controlling video, displays, architectural accent, commercial, industrial, residential lighting applications, and for operating and controlling LED video, LED displays, architectural accent, commercial, industrial, residential LED lighting applications | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Multimedia lighted display boards for use as architectural lighting and indoor lighting fixtures; LED lighting fixtures for use in video, displays, architectural accent, commercial, industrial, residential lighting applications; Lighting Fixtures; Lighting fixtures for use in video displays; LED (light emitting diode)lighting fixtures for use in display, architectural accent, commercial, industrial, and residential lighting applications, advertisement, messaging, instrumentation and illumination; light sources, namely, lighting arrays and lighting fixtures using LED technology | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 2, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 30, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 5, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 13, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 25, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 17, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 15, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |