Drawing for THE BONEYARD

USPTO serial 85560996

THE BONEYARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LEIPZIG, MARC J
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE BONEYARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anthony M. Keats

ANTHONY M KEATS STUBBS ALDERTON & MARKILES LLP1453 3RD STREET PROMENADESUITE 310SANTA MONICA, CA 90401

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041production of musical sound recordings; post-production editing services in the field of music; and record mastering servicesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 23, 2014MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jun 21, 2014ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jun 21, 2014EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Apr 7, 2014EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Feb 28, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 13, 2013GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED
Dec 13, 2013GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED
Dec 13, 2013CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED
Oct 16, 2013JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Aug 12, 2013GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Aug 12, 2013GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Aug 12, 2013CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Jul 11, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 11, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 8, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 2, 2013ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Jul 2, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 2, 2013EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jul 2, 2013JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jul 2, 2013EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Apr 16, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 2, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Jan 2, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 2, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 13, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 12, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 12, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 13, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 13, 2012MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED
Mar 12, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Mar 8, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance