USPTO serial 85580726
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Kabushiki Kaisha Hitachi Seisakusho
Tokyo, JP
Other trademarks owned by Kabushiki Kaisha Hitachi Seisakusho
Kabushiki Kaisha Hitachi Seisakusho
Tokyo, JP
Other trademarks owned by Kabushiki Kaisha Hitachi Seisakusho
Kabushiki Kaisha Hitachi Seisakusho
Tokyo, JP
Other trademarks owned by Kabushiki Kaisha Hitachi Seisakusho
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michelle C. Burke
MICHELLE C BURKE MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP227 W MONROE ST STE 4400CHICAGO, IL 60606-5058UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Repair and maintenance of computer hardware for safety control systems and computer hardware for monitoring safety control systems in nuclear power plants, heat power plants, steel plants, thermal and hydraulic plants and industrial plants | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Maintenance of control system software and monitoring software in nuclear power plants, heat power plants, steel plants, thermal and hydraulic plants and industrial plants | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2020 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 18, 2019 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 31, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 11, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 22, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 22, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 22, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 16, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 22, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 3, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 12, 2013 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2013 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2013 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 23, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2013 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 17, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 17, 2013 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 19, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 19, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 5, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 29, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 9, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |