Drawing for HINT

USPTO serial 85587635

HINT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CANTONE, KERI H
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HINT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jill M. Pietrini

JILL M PIETRINI SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP1901 AVENUE OF THE STARSSUITE 1600LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-6055

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Jewelry; key chains as jewelryACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 20, 2016MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jan 19, 2016ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jan 19, 2016EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Oct 9, 2015EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Sep 23, 2014CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Sep 22, 2014CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED
Jul 25, 2014JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Apr 24, 2014RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED
Apr 24, 2014CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Mar 26, 2014EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Mar 26, 2014JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Mar 10, 2014EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Mar 6, 2014MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 5, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 5, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 9, 2013RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Jan 11, 2013CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jan 10, 2013CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Dec 20, 2012ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Dec 20, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 17, 2012MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 25, 2012UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED
Sep 6, 2012PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED
Jul 18, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 18, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 16, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 10, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Apr 10, 2012AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED
Apr 9, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 8, 2012PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED
Apr 6, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance