USPTO serial 85593464
ARCLITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 4, 2014
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- —
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with ARCLITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Advanced Eye Protection IP Holding
Park City, UT
Other trademarks owned by Advanced Eye Protection IP Holding
Advanced Eye Protection IP Holding
Park City, UT
Other trademarks owned by Advanced Eye Protection IP Holding
Advanced Eye Protection IP Holding
Park City, UT
Other trademarks owned by Advanced Eye Protection IP Holding
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rachel Jacques
Rachel Jacques MASCHOFF BRENNAN1389 Center Drive, Suite 300PARK CITY, UT 84098United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | [ Ballistic resistant and blast resistant body armor and clothing, Bullet resistant clothing, Bullet-proof vests and clothing, Clothing for protection against accidents, Protective padded clothing for protection against bodily harm and blunt force trauma, Protective body armor, namely, ballistic, bullet, blast, slash and stab resistant clothing, Protective ballistic resistant and blast resistant body armor, clothing and garments; Face-protection shields, Protective face-shields for protective helmets, Hand-held protective shield for use by police, detention centers, correctional facilities and the like, Protective helmets; Safety helmets; ] Protective eye pieces, Eye covers for protective purposes, Eyewear accessories, namely, straps, neck cords [ and head straps ] which restrain eyewear from movement on a wearer, Eyewear cases, Eyeglass frames, Protective eyeglasses, Protective eyewear, Protective eyewear and component parts thereof, Protective glasses, Frames for glasses [ and pince-nez, Field-glasses, Magnifying glasses that fit on the user's face in the manner of eyeglasses, ] [ Safety goggles, Ballistic goggles; ] [ Protective ear coverings, Hearing protection headsets, not for medical use; Binoculars; ] [ Optical or telescopic lens sights ] [, Tactical laser sights, Weapon aiming devices, namely, Optical gun sights, Tactical optical firearm sights, Tactical optical sights, Telescopic gun sights, Optical lens sights, Optical devices, namely, eye pieces for helmet mounted displays, User wearable optical devices, namely, optical gun sights integrated into a protective helmet and optical gun sights integrated into a heads-up optical display ] ; Cases for spectacles and sunglasses, [ Chains for spectacles and for sunglasses, ] Eyewear, namely, sunglasses, eyeglasses and ophthalmic frames and cases therefor, Frames for spectacles and sunglasses, Lenses for sunglasses, Spectacles and sunglasses; Sunglass [ chains and ] cords, Sunglass lenses, Sunglasses, Sunglasses and spectacles | ACTIVE | May 8, 2014 |
| 025 | [ Clothing, namely, shirts, sweatshirts, jackets, button down shirts, collared shirts, golf shirts, long sleeved shirts, hats ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 8, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Advanced Eye Protection IP Holding
- Other trademarks owned by Advanced Eye Protection IP Holding
- Other trademarks owned by Advanced Eye Protection IP Holding
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named ARCLITE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2025 | NP89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF PARTIAL SEC. 8 & 9 EMAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2025 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 4, 2025 | 9G8P | REGISTERED - SEC. 9 GRANTED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8 | — |
| Mar 4, 2025 | 8PRT | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 30, 2024 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2023 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2022 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2022 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 30, 2022 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2022 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Mar 30, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 28, 2022 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2021 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| May 17, 2021 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2020 | PUM1 | OFFICE ACTION ISSUED POU1 | — |
| Dec 5, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 4, 2020 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2019 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 30, 2014 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2014 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2014 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 18, 2014 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2014 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 28, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2014 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2014 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 20, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 7, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2014 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 31, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 10, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 8, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 22, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 20, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 20, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 25, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 5, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 15, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 6, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 6, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 25, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 17, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |