USPTO serial 85602508
TRUSTED INTELLIGENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PEREZ, STEVEN M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TRUSTED INTELLIGENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New York, NY
New York, NY
NEW YORK, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anna W. Manville
ANNA W. MANVILLE ARNOLD & PORTER LLP555 12TH ST NW STE 100WASHINGTON, DC 20004-1206UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business investigation services; business risk management; forensic accounting services; business intelligence services; screening, credentialing, and organizing third-party vendors, suppliers, and contractors, and documentation and information on behalf of others | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Financial risk management services; financial due diligence; financial evaluation of assets and debt recovery services related thereto; business credit verification services | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Storage services for archiving electronic data | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer security consultancy; design and development of electronic data security systems and contingency planning for information systems; maintenance of computer software relating to computer security and prevention of computer risks; computer forensic services; consulting services in the field of forensic science; data mining; computer consultation in the field of computer security technology relating to data governance, analytics and compliance; computer services, namely, data recovery services; computer security consulting services in the nature of high-tech cyber testing, testing of malicious code/malware, network vulnerability and penetration testing for computer systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Pre-employment background screening; identification verification services, namely, providing authentication of personal identification information; consulting services in the field of privacy and security laws, regulations and requirements; consulting services in the field of maintaining the security and integrity of databases; consultation in the field of privacy, security and data governance law; investigation of assets, credit reports, fiscal assessments, and collection reports for security or authentication purposes; security services, namely conducting recovery operations for the recovery of property and personnel; providing security assessments for businesses; fraud detection services in the fields of insurance, banking, credit cards, and business transactions; regulatory compliance consulting in the fields of anti-money laundering and bribery; consultation services in the field of privacy, security and data governance laws and regulations and requirements; legal consultation services; litigation support services; litigation support services, namely, conducting electronic legal discovery; consultation in the field of data theft and identity theft; security services, namely, threat vulnerability analysis and mitigation and emergency and crisis response and management; security services, namely, providing executive protection; intellectual property consultation; security services, namely, providing security assessments of physical locations, information systems, and working environments; private investigation services; security consultancy; regulatory compliance consulting in the field of environmental regulation; consulting and legal services in the field of privacy and security laws, regulations, and compliance requirements as they relate to data governance | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kroll Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Kroll Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by KROLL, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named TRUSTED INTELLIGENCE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 16, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 26, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 10, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2015 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2015 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 2, 2015 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 2, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 18, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 16, 2015 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2014 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2014 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 30, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2014 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 25, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 7, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 18, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 16, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 16, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 19, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 30, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 22, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 20, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 27, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |