Drawing for DYNAFORCE

USPTO serial 85618184

DYNAFORCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SOBRAL, CHRISTINA
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DYNAFORCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen L. Sapp

STEPHEN L. SAPP LOCKE LORD LLP2200 ROSS AVE STE 2200DALLAS, TX 75201-2748UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Batteries for land vehiclesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 30, 2015ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Jan 6, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 6, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 25, 2013ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Jun 14, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jun 14, 2013NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED
Jun 13, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jun 13, 2013DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Jun 12, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
May 30, 2013DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
May 30, 2013ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED
May 29, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
May 29, 2013MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 4, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 9, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Oct 9, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 19, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Sep 4, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 4, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 29, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 29, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 29, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 29, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 28, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 28, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 28, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 28, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 15, 2012MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
May 14, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
May 10, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance