USPTO serial 85639222
COAST TO COAST JOHN C. MAXWELL COACHING TRAINING AND SPEAKING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COAST TO COAST JOHN C. MAXWELL COACHING TRAINING AND SPEAKING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advice and information concerning commercial business management; Advice in the field of business management and marketing; Advisory services relating to business management and business operations; Assistance to industrial or commercial enterprises in the running of their business; Assistance, advisory services and consultancy with regard to business planning, business analysis, business management, and business organization; Business administration and management; Business advisory services, consultancy and information; Business assistance, advisory and consulting services in the field of religious organizations; Business consultation in the field of business leadership development; Business consultation in the field of coaching and leadership; Business development services, namely, providing start-up support for businesses of others; Business efficiency advice; Business efficiency expert services; Business enquiries and investigations; Business failure analysis services; Business feasibility studies; Business information and accounting advisory services; Business information and inquiries; Business information management; Business information management, namely, electronic reporting of business information, business analytics, namely, business investigations, evaluations, expert appraisals, information and research, trade spend business management; Business information reporting services for hospitals, namely, providing hospital specific reports for the purpose of analyzing government reimbursement data and drive business decision making; Business information services and appraisals; Business information services in the nature of providing information on business opportunities; Business information services, namely, gathering and reporting information regarding e-mail addresses of others that are made available to other companies for commercial purposes; Business information services, namely, providing an online compilation of annual employment data and statistics for the United States' high-tech industry; Business intermediary and advisory services in the field of selling products and rendering services; Business investigations; Business investigations, evaluations, expert appraisals, information and research; Business invoicing services | ACTIVE | Mar 15, 2012 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 29, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 28, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |