Drawing for SPICENSEA

USPTO serial 85639687

SPICENSEA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COWARD, JEFFERY
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 100 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPICENSEA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alexander Guzman

Alexander Guzman Law Office of Alexander Guzman P.C.201 W 77TH Street, Suite 16BNEW YORK, NY 10024-6660UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Aromatic body care products, namely, body lotion, shower gel, cuticle cream, shampoo, conditioner, non-medicated lip balm, soap, body polish, body and foot scrub and non-medicated foot creamACTIVEAug 13, 2013

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 2, 2015PC.DPETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED—
Nov 19, 2015APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Jul 29, 2015APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Jun 10, 2015TPDRTEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Oct 25, 2014PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Sep 2, 2014PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Aug 29, 2014APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Jun 27, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 27, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 18, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 9, 2014PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jun 9, 2014EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jun 9, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 9, 2014NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jun 9, 2014TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jun 9, 2014PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 9, 2014PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 5, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2013CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 17, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 16, 2013SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 16, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 9, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 4, 2013NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Sep 3, 2013IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Sep 3, 2013EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Sep 3, 2013TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Sep 3, 2013PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 3, 2013PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 29, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 25, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 25, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 30, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 30, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 10, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 18, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 9, 2012MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jun 8, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 4, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance