USPTO serial 85642588
RUSTIC LUXE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4437677Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 19, 2013
- Examiner
- LEE, JANET H
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with RUSTIC LUXE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail store services, on-line retail store services and catalog mail order services featuring house wares, home accessories, indoor and outdoor furniture, pillows, slipcovers, rugs, lamps and lighting fixtures, curtains, curtain rods, bed linens, bath linens, candle holders, picture frames, mirrors, vases, baskets made of wicker, interior decorating books, wall coverings, window coverings, window shades, fabric, namely, curtain fabric, upholstery fabric, fabric made of cotton and fabric made of gauze, bedding, bath rugs, towels, shower curtains, books, clothing, hardware, namely, drapery hardware, furniture hardware, bathroom hardware, cookware, bakeware, cutlery, kitchen gadgets, utensils, dinnerware, tableware, glassware, flatware, serving trays, ceramics, gourmet foods, table linens, kitchen towels, baskets, brooms, brushes and dusters for cleaning, barbecues and barbecue accessories, picnic accessories | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 11, 2012 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2020 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 13, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 13, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2018 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2013 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Oct 17, 2013 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 16, 2013 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 15, 2013 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 15, 2013 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 9, 2013 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 9, 2013 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 7, 2013 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 7, 2013 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 28, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2013 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 4, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 21, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 20, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |