USPTO serial 85642784
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | milk shakes | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | snack mix consisting primarily of candies, sweets, candy bars, and beverages made of coffee; beverages made of tea; caffeine-free coffee; coffee; candies; sweets; candy; candy bars; chocolate bars; chocolate candies; chocolate-based ready-to-eat food bars; fruit, nut and cereal based energy bars not for use as a meal replacement; chewing gum; roasted, powdered, granulated coffee, and coffee in drinks; coffee-based beverage containing milk; espresso; flavored ices; flavored, sweetened gelatin desserts; fruit ice; fruit ice bar; fruit ices; fruit sauces excluding cranberry and applesauce; herbal tea for food purposes; ice cream; ice cream drinks; ice cream mixes; ice cream sandwiches; ice milk bars; instant coffee; lollipops; milk chocolate; muffin mixes; muffins; non-medicated lozenges; pancake mixes; pancake syrup; pastries; prepared coffee and coffee-based beverages; ready to eat salad dressings; salad sauces; sugar-free chewing gum; sugar-free sweets; sugarless candies; sugarless chewing gum; sugarless sweets; tea; tea bags; tea for infusions; tea substitutes | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 18, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 9, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2016 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 8, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2016 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 7, 2016 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2015 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2015 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 10, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2015 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2015 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2015 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 12, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 17, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2014 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2014 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 17, 2013 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 22, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 2, 2013 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 19, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 18, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 9, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 6, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 15, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 13, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 15, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 13, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |