USPTO serial 85643053
COOL CLOUD CLYDE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WATSON, JULIE A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COOL CLOUD CLYDE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Private Branch exchange (PBX) products that provide voice communication exclusive to the hospitality and managed living market, namely, computer hardware and software for the transmission of voice and data; analog communication products exclusive to the hospitality and managed living market, namely, analog telephone equipment, namely, analog PBX and hosted PBX systems, consisting primarily of operating software for voice communications and analog telephone switching equipment; digital communication products exclusive to the hospitality and managed living market, namely, digital telephone equipment, namely, digital PBX and hosted PBX systems consisting primarily of operating software for voice communications and digital telephone switching equipment; data communication products exclusive to the hospitality and managed living market, namely, computer hardware and software for the transmission of data; voice over Internet protocol (VOIP) communication products exclusive to the hospitality and managed living market, namely, communication equipment to provide radio, streaming video, wireless Internet, and VOIP communication, namely, IP PBX and hosted PBX systems consisting primarily of servers; session initiated protocol (SIP) communication products exclusive to the hospitality and managed living market, namely, computer hardware and session initiated protocol software for the transmission of voice and data; high speed Internet access (HSIA) communication products exclusive to the hospitality and managed living market, namely, communication hardware and software for providing access to the Internet; voice mail communication products exclusive to the hospitality and managed living market, namely, computer hardware and software for the recording, storing and playback of voice messages; call costing products exclusive to the hospitality and managed living market, namely, computer hardware and software for documenting and storing station message detailed recordings (SMDR); interface communication products exclusive to the hospitality and managed living market, namely, electronic communication equipment that provides hardware and software interface capability, namely, PBX interface systems consisting primarily of servers; computer software communication products exclusive to the hospitality and managed living market, namely, communication software for providing access to the Internet and electronic equipment that interface via the Internet, namely, high speed Internet access systems; end point products exclusive to the hospitality and managed living market, namely, analog, digital, cordless, fixed location and VOIP telephone hand sets and equipment, namely, end user telephones; custom web and Internet products exclusive to the hospitality and managed living market, namely, computer programs for user interface design; downloadable graphic user interface (GUI) software, downloadable software and computer software all providing real-time, integrated business management intelligence by combining information from various databases and presenting it in an easy-to-understand user interface; customized hardware products exclusive to the hospitality and managed living market, namely, computer hardware and operating software for voice communication devices; computer software for administration and operation of computer networks exclusively to the hospitality and managed living market | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 15, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 11, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 17, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 27, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 24, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 24, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 24, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 3, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 14, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 25, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 25, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 19, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 21, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |