USPTO serial 85643399
BOMBER GEAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAMONT, MIAH ROSENBERG
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BOMBER GEAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Dry tops, dry pants, and dry shorts used for kayaking | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2014 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 4, 2014 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 4, 2014 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 6, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 19, 2014 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 14, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 30, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 18, 2014 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Feb 28, 2014 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2014 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2014 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 3, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 14, 2013 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2013 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2013 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2013 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 6, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 30, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2013 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 30, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 30, 2013 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 11, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 11, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 27, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 26, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |