USPTO serial 85646779
DIRECT PEERING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINK, GINA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DIRECT PEERING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Telecommunication services, namely, providing carrier to carrier peering, directory identification, address resolution and intelligent routing services; telephone communication and Internet telephony services; voice over Internet protocol (VoIP) services; voice telephony services, transmission of voice, video, data, image, text, music, sound, directory, location, presence, messaging, and facsimile services; intelligent network services; protocol conversion, transcoding and interoperability services to facilitate interworking between the public telephone network and Internet protocol networks; managed computer and communications gateway and network connection services; managed directory identification, address resolution and intelligent routing services; hosted computer and communications gateway and network connection services; hosted directory identification, address resolution and intelligent routing services; routing calls using VoIP services, telephone communication, using secure multi-carrier databases for mapping of standard PSTN telephone numbers to resolvable Internet Protocol (IP) addresses, namely, telephone communication using the latest international public telecommunication numbering plan; digital telephony services; IP telephony services; intelligent routing gateway services, namely, telecommunications routing and junction services; click-to-call services, namely, telephony communication services initiated via web links on computers or mobile devices; Video communications services, namely, transmission of information through video communications systems, auto video and audio conferencing services, video and audio conference-on-demand services; blast calling services; bridge to connect services for audio and video conferencing; voice peering network services connecting carriers to transport calls anytime and to anywhere; intelligent network services, namely, providing a network architecture for fixed and mobile telecom networks having features such as caller identification, pre-payment and call answer; services to facilitate interworking between the public telephone network and Internet protocol networks; managed computer and communications gateway and network connection services; intelligent routing services featuring managed directory identification and address resolution | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 25, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 26, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |