USPTO serial 85648651
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
MONTREAL, QUEBEC, CA
Montreal, Quebec, CA
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Applications, namely, computer application software for use in computer, medical, industrial, scientific, aerospace, defense, automotive, wireless, telecommunications and video security, computer hardware and software for use in computer, medical, industrial, scientific, aerospace, defense, automotive, wireless, telecommunications and video security, digital signal processing boards, digital signal systems comprised of circuit boards, system-level software development tools enabling more efficient implementation of signal processing algorithms; computer software that stores and manages text, video, data, documents and images | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Business consulting for others in the field of selecting, analyzing, programming, optimizing, modeling, updating, implementing and using electronic products, computer applications, computer hardware and software, digital signal processing boards, digital signal equipment and digital signal systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Manufacture of electronic products, namely, Applications, namely, computer application software for use in computer, medical, industrial, scientific, aerospace, defense, automotive, wireless, telecommunications and video security, computer hardware and software for use in computer, medical, industrial, scientific, aerospace, defense, automotive, wireless, telecommunications and video security, digital signal processing boards, digital signal systems comprised of circuit boards, system-level software development tools enabling more efficient implementation of signal processing algorithms; computer software that stores and manages text, video, data, documents and images to the order and/or specification of others for use in the computer, medical, industrial, scientific, aerospace, defense, automotive, wireless and telecommunications industries | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Training services for others in the field of selecting, analyzing, programming, optimizing, modeling, updating, implementing and using electronic products, computer applications, computer hardware and software, digital signal processing boards, digital signal equipment and digital signal systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design and development services to the order and specifications of others of electronic products, computer applications, computer software and hardware, digital signal processing boards, digital signal equipment and digital signal systems; custom design and manufacturing, namely, engineering, to the order and specification of others of electronic products, computer applications, computer software and hardware, digital signal processing boards, digital signal equipment and digital signal systems, all of which are used for audio, video, images, data, networking, voice processing, wireless and telecommunications; design and material testing of electronic products for use in the computer, medical, industrial, scientific, aerospace, defense, automotive, wireless and telecommunications industries, to the order and/or specification of others | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 28, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 28, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 1, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 9, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 9, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 9, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 2, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 22, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 22, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 14, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 25, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 20, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 20, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 10, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 4, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 3, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 31, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 20, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 2, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 20, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |