Drawing for PERFECT TEN

USPTO serial 85649690

PERFECT TEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LEE, DOUGLAS
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PERFECT TEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jay Bettinger

Jay Bettinger BETTINGER LLP1401 Dove Street, Suite 540Newport Beach, CA 92660UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Natural, organic and food based non-alcoholic beverages and meal replacement foods and bars, namely, fruit and vegetable based food beverages, fruit and vegetable based food bars also containing grains, nuts, seeds, and chocolate, and packaged meals consisting primarily of fruits or vegetables also containing grains, nuts, seeds, and chocolateACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 7, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 7, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 14, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Feb 13, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Feb 13, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Jan 31, 2014UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN
Jan 28, 2014NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED
Jan 27, 2014TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION
Jan 27, 2014PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Jan 27, 2014PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Jan 6, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 6, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 4, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Nov 19, 2013WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED
Nov 19, 2013WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED
Jun 4, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 9, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Apr 9, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 20, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Mar 6, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 6, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 23, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 14, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 13, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 13, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 2, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 2, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 2, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 21, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance