USPTO serial 85665175
ALMAS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ALMAS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Studio City, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dr. Dariush G. Adli
DR DARIUSH G ADLI ADLI LAW GROUP PC444 S FLOWER STREETSUITE 1750LOS ANGELES, CA 90071Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Food products, namely, sausages, cold cuts, meat, chicken, chicken kabobs, shish kabobs, lamb kabobs, ground meat kabobs, stews for consumption on or off the premises | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2014 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 15, 2014 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 15, 2014 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 29, 2014 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 16, 2014 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2014 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2014 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 20, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 13, 2013 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2013 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2013 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 3, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 19, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2013 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 19, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 19, 2013 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 20, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 20, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 20, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 26, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 25, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 25, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |