USPTO serial 85672788
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat, fish, poultry and game; meat extracts; preserved, frozen, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies, jams, compotes; eggs; milk and milk products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; edible oils and fats | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | Coffee, tea, cocoa and artificial coffee; rice; tapioca and sago; flour; preparations made from cereals, namely, cereal based snack food; bread, pastry and confectionery made of sugar; edible ices; sugar, honey, treacle; yeast, baking-powder; salt; mustard; vinegar, sauces; spices; ice; flavoring syrups | ABANDONED | — |
| 031 | Fresh fruits and vegetables; seeds, namely, bird seed, flower seeds, fruit seeds, grass seeds, plant seeds, seeds for agricultural purposes, seeds for flowers, seeds for fruit and vegetables, seeds for horticultural purposes; natural plants and flowers; foodstuffs for animals | ABANDONED | — |
| 032 | Beers; mineral and aerated waters; non-alcoholic beverages, namely, carbonated beverages, fruit juice beverages, malt beverages; fruit beverages and fruit juices; syrups for making beverages | ABANDONED | — |
| 033 | Alcoholic beverages except beers | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2017 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Jun 1, 2017 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 19, 2017 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2015 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 16, 2015 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 6, 2014 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 19, 2014 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 19, 2014 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 19, 2014 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 19, 2014 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 12, 2014 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Feb 4, 2014 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 4, 2014 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2013 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 10, 2013 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 11, 2013 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 22, 2013 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 6, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 1, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 1, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 30, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 5, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2012 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 20, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 17, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |