Drawing for X-GREEN

USPTO serial 85674023

X-GREEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BERNS, LEE ANNE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with X-GREEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael J. Keller

MICHAEL J. KELLER Keller Life Science Law, P.A.P.O.Box 969Pompano Beach, FL 33061-0969UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001ion exchange resins for water filtration, activated carbons for water filtration and ceramic particles used for water filtrationACTIVE
011seawater desalination units; water filtration and purification units and replacement cartridges and filters therefor; water filters; water purification apparatus and machines; water filters for consumer and industrial use; water softening apparatus; water treatment equipment, namely, chemical sterilization units; water treatment equipment, namely, ultraviolet sterilization units, reverse osmosis filtration units; sewage purification apparatus; drinking fountains; liquid purification and filtration apparatus, namely, filter cartridges containing polymeric membranes and hollow fibers for purification of liquids, namely, water, wine, beer, juice, chemical solutions and wastewaterACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 2, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 1, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 12, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Feb 1, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jan 30, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jan 30, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jan 30, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 30, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 4, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jun 4, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 15, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Apr 27, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 26, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 16, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 16, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Apr 16, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Apr 16, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Apr 16, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Mar 12, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 12, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 12, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 16, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 16, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 16, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 19, 2012MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED
Jul 18, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jul 14, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance