Drawing for FLUID SCALING

USPTO serial 85679581

FLUID SCALING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
DINALLO, KEVIN M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FLUID SCALING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Danielle D. Janitch

DANIELLE D. JANITCH OSBORN MALEDON, P.A.2929 N CENTRAL AVE STE 2100PHOENIX, AZ 85012-2793UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Internet hosting services, namely, hosting of digital content on the Internet and website hosting; Computer services, namely, management of cloud computing systems and applications for others; Technical support services, namely, management services for monitoring and administration of public and private cloud computing IT and application systemsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 11, 2013MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
Jun 11, 2013ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Jun 10, 2013EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Apr 10, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Apr 10, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 10, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 19, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 19, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 14, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 12, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 13, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 6, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 24, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jul 20, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance