USPTO serial 85687361
BIG TRANSACTION DATA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CRAWFORD, MARY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BIG TRANSACTION DATA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Ramat Gan, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian J. Winterfeldt
Brian J. Winterfeldt, Esq. KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP2900 K Street NW, North TowerSuite 200WASHINGTON, DC 20007-5118Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware; computer software for use in problem detection and tracking, monitoring, managing and enhancing the productivity, performance, accessibility and availability of third party and custom built software applications, systems, and services hosted on and across servers, computing tiers, end user computing devices and/or computer networks and/or accessed from servers, computing tiers, end user computing devices or computer networks, and related services; data gathering, storage, mining and analysis with regard to IT requests, transactions and operations processed by such monitored applications, systems and services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer consultation, software installation, software implementation and software development services related to problem detection, tracking, monitoring, managing and enhancing the productivity, performance, accessibility and availability of third party and custom built software applications, systems and services hosted on and across servers, computing tiers, end user computing devices and/or computer networks and/or accessed from servers, computing tiers, end user computing devices or computer networks; data gathering, storage, mining and analysis with regard to IT requests, transactions and operations processed by such monitored applications, systems and services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 8, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 26, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |