Drawing for TOP GLASS

USPTO serial 85689992

TOP GLASS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CROMER, ZACHARY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TOP GLASS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Keith Swedo

KEITH SWEDO DONALD C. LUCAS , LUCAS & MERCANTI, LLP30 BROAD ST, 21ST FLNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Laminated and molten building materials of metal, namely, composite panels composed primarily of metal, metal tracks, clamps, washers, screws, wheels, stoppers and plates for sliding doors; metal rails; metal chains, nails and screws of metal for sliding doors; rigid and articulated metal hardware, namely, metal tracks, clamps, washers, screws, wheels, stoppers and plates for sliding doors for operating, supporting and hanging doors, windows, blinds, casings, curtains and door panels; metal jalousies and metal gratings for panels; doors of metal; door frames of metal and window frames of metal; metal sliding doorsACTIVE
019Building glass; window glass, door frames not of metal and window frames not of metal, windows not of metal and door panels not of metalACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 17, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 16, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 28, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jun 27, 2016EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Jun 2, 2016EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Jun 2, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 2, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 9, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Dec 7, 2015EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Dec 7, 2015EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Dec 7, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 9, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jun 6, 2015EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jun 2, 2015EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jun 2, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 12, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Dec 11, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Dec 5, 2014EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Dec 5, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 2, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jul 1, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jun 30, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Jun 6, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jun 6, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 4, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 10, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 28, 2013ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED
Sep 9, 2013ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Aug 13, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Aug 13, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 24, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Jul 5, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 2, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 14, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 14, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jun 14, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jun 14, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jun 14, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jun 4, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 3, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 3, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 1, 2012GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 1, 2012GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 1, 2012CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 27, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 7, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Aug 2, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance