Drawing for UNLOCK PERFORMANCE

USPTO serial 85703697

UNLOCK PERFORMANCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LAMONT, MIAH ROSENBERG
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UNLOCK PERFORMANCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Timothy D. Casey

TIMOTHY D. CASEY WOODCOCK WASHBURN LLP2929 ARCH ST FL 12PHILADELPHIA, PA 19104-2891UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Software for electrical component design and analysis; software for automated processing of data and workflow managementACTIVE
042Electrical systems components design servicesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 19, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 18, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 16, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 21, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Apr 21, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 1, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Mar 13, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 11, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 9, 2015RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Aug 11, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jan 24, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jan 21, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 8, 2013GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jul 8, 2013GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jul 8, 2013CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jun 19, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 18, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 18, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 18, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 22, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Aug 17, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance