Drawing for IMRI

USPTO serial 85713805

IMRI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
STEEL, ALYSSA PALADINO
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IMRI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kerri E. Burke

David R. Josephs PARTRIDGE SNOW & HAHN LLP40 Westminster StreetSuite 1100PROVIDENCE, RI 02903-7120

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Developing computer software for government agencies and nonprofit organizations to use in the planning and organization of emergency response and public safety servicesACTIVEFeb 13, 2013

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 9, 2014MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
May 9, 2014ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
May 8, 2014EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Nov 7, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 2013CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 2013SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Nov 7, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Oct 18, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Oct 3, 2013IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Oct 3, 2013EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Apr 30, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 5, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Mar 5, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 13, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Jan 26, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 26, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 13, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 9, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jan 9, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jan 9, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jan 9, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Dec 20, 2012GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 20, 2012GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 20, 2012CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 19, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 5, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Aug 30, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance