Drawing for TARGET ZERO

USPTO serial 85729682

TARGET ZERO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CROMER, ZACHARY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with TARGET ZERO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Chad M. Smith

CHAD M. SMITH INVICTA LAW GROUP PLLC2775 HARBOR AVE SW STE DSEATTLE, WA 98126-2138UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Promoting public awareness of the need for traffic safety, driving habits, and neighborhood safety concerns including through the distribution of traffic safety materials, namely, printed rack cards, Public Service Announcements in video form, and digital information via email and website, in connection therewithACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 23, 2013MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 23, 2013ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 27, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Mar 27, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 27, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 20, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 20, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 19, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 15, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 17, 2013GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED
Jan 17, 2013GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED
Jan 17, 2013EPENCOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY
Jan 17, 2013CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED
Jan 10, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 21, 2012MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED
Sep 20, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Sep 18, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance