Drawing for TECHNOMIC MENUMONITOR

USPTO serial 85739234

TECHNOMIC MENUMONITOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
OLANDRIA, WARREN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TECHNOMIC MENUMONITOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gerald M. Newman

Gerald M. Newman Schoenberg, Finkel, Newman & Rosenberg222 S. Riverside PlazaSuite 2100Chicago, IL 60606

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
AFood and Beverage ResearchACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 16, 2013MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
Apr 16, 2013ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Apr 3, 2013LOAPLETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED
Mar 29, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 28, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 10, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 2, 2012MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Oct 1, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Sep 29, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance