Drawing for ECOBLEND

USPTO serial 85768683

ECOBLEND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ECOBLEND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nancy V. Stephens

NANCY V STEPHENS FOSTER PEPPER PLLC1111 3RD AVENUE SUITE 3400SEATTLE, WA 98101-3264UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Plastic molding compounds which incorporate recycled content for use in plastic extrusion operationsACTIVEMay 21, 2013

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 18, 2015ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Nov 12, 2015MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Nov 11, 2015ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Nov 11, 2015EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Oct 1, 2015EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Apr 20, 2015GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Apr 20, 2015GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Apr 20, 2015CNCFSU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN
Apr 2, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 2, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 30, 2015ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Mar 30, 2015EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Mar 30, 2015JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Mar 30, 2015EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Sep 29, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Sep 29, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 29, 2014CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 4, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 4, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 26, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 27, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2014CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2014SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Jan 24, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Dec 11, 2013IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Dec 11, 2013EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jun 11, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 16, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Apr 16, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 27, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Mar 14, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 13, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 1, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 1, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Mar 1, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Mar 1, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Mar 1, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Mar 1, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 7, 2012MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Nov 6, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Nov 5, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance