USPTO serial 85769986
HALLA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YAO, GRETTA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 118- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HALLA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul D. Greeley
PAUL D. GREELEY OHLANDT, GREELEY, RUGGIERO & PERLE, LLP1 LANDMARK SQ FL 10STAMFORD, CT 06901-2619UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Horns for motor cars; Anti-theft devices for motor cars Wheel rims for motor cars; Motorcycles; Parts and accessories for motorcycles, namely, motorcycle wheel rims, Wheels for motorcycles, spokes for motorcycle wheels, motorcycle stands, motorcycle frames, motorcycle handle bars, motorcycle wheel hubs; Two-wheeled motor vehicles; Air bags as safety devices for automobiles; Steering wheels for automobiles; Reversing alarms for automobiles; Parts and accessories for automobiles, namely, wheels; Electric cars; Tandem bicycles; Mopeds; Touring bicycles; Delivery bicycles; Bicycles; Bicycle wheel rims; Wheels for bicycles, cycles; Bicycle wheel spokes; Frames for luggage carriers for bicycles; Bicycle stands; Bicycle frames; Bicycle handle bars; Parts and accessories for bicycles, namely, handlebars; Shock absorbing springs for motor cars; Spiral springs for vehicles, namely, shock absorbing springs for vehicles; Spring-assisted hydraulic shock absorbers for vehicles; Air springs for vehicles; Suspension Shock absorbers for vehicles; Shock absorbing Springs for vehicles; Suspension shock absorbers for vehicles; Shock absorbers for automobiles; Brakes for motor cars; Brake linings for motor cars; Brake shoes for motor cars; Brake segments for motor cars; Disk brakes for vehicles; Band brakes for vehicles; Brakes for vehicles; Brake facings for vehicles; Brake linings for vehicles; Brake shoes for vehicles; Brake systems for vehicles; Braking systems for vehicles and parts thereof; Brake segments for vehicles; Brake Shoes for vehicles; Block brakes for vehicles; Conical brakes for vehicles; Non-skid devices for vehicle tires, namely, brakes for vehicles; Motorcycle brakes; Band brakes for land vehicles; Block brakes for land vehicles; Brake pads for automobiles; Brakes for bicycles, motorcycles; Bicycle brakes; Gearboxes for motor cars; Crankcases for components for motor cars other than for engines; Clutch mechanisms for motor cars; Torque converters for motor cars; Gears for motorcycles; Reduction gears for land vehicles; Gears for land vehicles; Gear boxes for land vehicles; Transmission shafts for land vehicles; Gears for vehicles; Cranks for cycles; Wheel Bearings for land vehicles; Axles for land vehicles; Shaft Couplings for land vehicles, Axle journals for vehicles; Trailer couplings; Electric motors for motor cars; Motors for motorcycles; Alternating currentAC motors for land vehicles; Driving motors for land vehicles; Motors for land vehicles; Servomotors for land vehicles; Electric Motors for land vehicles; Direct currentDC motors for land vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 29, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 12, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 10, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 8, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 4, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 27, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 4, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 9, 2012 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |